Buckeye Coal Co.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.
416 U.S. 267 (1974) Cited 759 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.
384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 53 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"
N.L.R.B. v. City Yellow Cab Company
344 F.2d 575 (6th Cir. 1965) Cited 26 times 1 Legal Analyses
Stating that at times where no representatives of management were present, switch-board operators were not supervisors in part because company officers were at all times reachable by phone
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Bleachery
257 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1958) Cited 33 times 1 Legal Analyses
Stating that the essential inquiry is whether the employer shares the power of management
Poultry Enterprises v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
216 F.2d 798 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 14 times
No. 14892. November 24, 1954. A.C. Wheeler, C.J. Thurmond, Wheeler, Robinson Thurmond, Emory F. Robinson, C.D. Stewart, Gainesville, Ga., for petitioner. Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Fannie M. Boyls, John Francis Lawless, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge,