Brushy Mountain Group, LLC

18 Cited authorities

  1. Coach Services, Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC

    668 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 73 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence was insufficient to establish COACH mark used with handbags and leather goods met fame threshold for federal dilution claim
  2. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 164 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Listing thirteen factors relevant to likelihood of confusion determination
  3. On-Line Careline, Inc. v. America Online

    229 F.3d 1080 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 64 times
    Applying Recot in analyzing the similarity of services
  4. Palm Bay Imp. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin

    396 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 53 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding similarity between VEUVE ROYALE and two VEUVE CLICQUOT marks in part because VEUVE "remains a ‘prominent feature’ as the first word in the mark and the first word to appear on the label"
  5. Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp.

    222 F.3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 55 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding similarity between LASER for golf clubs and golf balls and LASERSWING for golf practice devices, and noting that "the term ‘swing’ is both common and descriptive" and therefore "may be given little weight in reaching a conclusion on likelihood of confusion"
  6. Recot, Inc. v. Becton

    214 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 49 times
    Holding that the Board legally erred in not according sufficient weight to evidence of a mark's fame in a likelihood of confusion analysis, vacating, and remanding for further consideration
  7. Herbko Intern., Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc.

    308 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 41 times
    Explaining that proprietary rights are necessary to show priority of use when petitioning for cancellation under section 2(d)
  8. In re Nat. Data Corp.

    753 F.2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that a "likelihood of confusion cannot be predicated on dissection of a mark"
  9. In re Mighty Leaf Tea

    601 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2010)   Cited 19 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting an argument that the specific style of a registered mark could serve to distinguish the applicant's mark in standard character form
  10. Stone Lion Capital Partners, L.P. v. Lion Capital LLP

    746 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2014)   Cited 13 times
    Reviewing the weight given to the similarity-of-the-marks factor for legal error
  11. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,442 times   205 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"