Brunswick Food And Drug

16 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
  2. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

    351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Cement Transport, Inc.

    490 F.2d 1024 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 35 times

    No. 73-1260. Argued October 17, 1973. Decided January 22, 1974. Rehearing Denied March 4, 1974. Lawrence Levien, N.L.R.B., for petitioner; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Assistant Gen. Counsel, Alan D. Cirker, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Louis E. Woolery, Louisville, Ky., for respondent; James U. Smith, Jr., Louisville, Ky., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and O'SULLIVAN

  5. Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    430 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 40 times
    In Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. NLRB, 430 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1970), which the Board cites, the Fifth Circuit focussed on the context of the misconduct as the key to deciding whether the misconduct was protected by the Act.
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 925

    460 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 37 times

    No. 71-2158. May 17, 1972. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Stanley R. Zirkin, Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., Thomas A. Capelle, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: The

  7. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under ยง 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"
  8. Trustees of Boston University v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 391 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 20 times

    No. 76-1331. January 28, 1977. Harold Hestnes, Boston, Mass., with whom John G. Fabiano, Waban, Mass., James L. Quarles, III, Washington, D.C., and Hale Dorr, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. John G. Elligers, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen Armstrong, and Woody N. Peterson, Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief

  9. Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    644 F.2d 834 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    In Golden Day Schools, 644 F.2d 834, the court noted that although the child care workers' leaflet to parents included harsh language and serious charges about the care of the children, it fell "woefully short of the malicious tone" that would justify a discharge under Jefferson Standard. Appellant correctly points out that the court in Golden Day Schools determined that the leaflet played no part in the discharge of the employees.
  10. Mary Carter Paint Co. v. F.T.C

    333 F.2d 654 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 28 times
    In Mary Carter Paint Co. v. F.T.C., 333 F.2d 654 (5 Cir. 1964), this Court reversed an order of the Federal Trade Commission on the ground that the Commission had departed from its previously established rule.