§

Brunswick Corporation

No. 78875524 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 28, 2008)
Brunswick Corporation

9 Cited authorities

  1. In re Dr Pepper Co.

    836 F.2d 508 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 19 times
    Holding that a contest promoting one's own goods is not an independent service

  2. Lands' End, Inc. v. Manback

    797 F. Supp. 511 (E.D. Va. 1992)   Cited 7 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Civ. A. No. 92-0715-A. July 31, 1992 Lawrence Jay Gotts, Kirkland Ellis, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Richard Cullen, U.S. Atty., E.D.Va., Richmond, Va., Richard Parker, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION CLAUDE HILTON, Chief Judge This matter came before the court on July 16, 1992 on cross motions for summary judgment. Both parties agree that no material facts are in dispute and the court should decide this case on the summary judgment motions. The plaintiff, Lands'

  3. Roux Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol Inc.

    427 F.2d 823 (C.C.P.A. 1970)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "Hair Color So Natural Only Her Hairdresser Knows for Sure" is protectable as a trademark

  4. Application of Marriott Corporation

    459 F.2d 525 (C.C.P.A. 1972)   Cited 7 times
    Likening the menus at issue to point-of-sale counter and window displays previously found acceptable

  5. In re Bose Corp.

    546 F.2d 893 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 1 times

    Patent Appeal No. 76-581. December 16, 1976. Charles Hieken, Hieken Cohen, Waltham, Mass., atty. of record, for appellant. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; Fred W. Sherling, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. LANE, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board) affirming the refusal to register SYNCOM for loudspeaker

  6. Application of Compagnie Nat. Air France

    265 F.2d 938 (C.C.P.A. 1959)

    Patent Appeal No. 6424. April 22, 1959. Douglas H. Kenyon, New York City (Kenyon Kenyon, New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C., for Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Acting Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and JOHNSON, retired, Associate Judges. MARTIN, Acting Chief Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, affirming the refusal of the Examiner of Trademarks to register "Sky-Room"

  7. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,802 times   123 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  8. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 2,949 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark

  9. Section 2.56 - Specimens

    37 C.F.R. § 2.56   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) An application under section 1(a) of the Act, an amendment to allege use under § 2.76 , a statement of use under § 2.88 , an affidavit or declaration of continued use or excusable nonuse under § 2.160 , or an affidavit or declaration of use or excusable nonuse under § 7.36 must include one specimen per class showing the mark as actually used in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services identified. When requested by the Office as reasonably necessary to proper examination, additional