Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co.
5 Cited authorities
Holmberg v. Armbrecht
327 U.S. 392 (1946) Cited 1,365 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that Erie does not require federal courts to apply state tolling doctrines to federal causes of action
Hohri v. United States
782 F.2d 227 (D.C. Cir. 1986) Cited 462 timesHolding that provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 1983, 1985 and 1986, "by their terms, do not apply to actions against the United States"
Fitzgerald v. Seamans
553 F.2d 220 (D.C. Cir. 1977) Cited 134 timesFinding no equitable tolling because appellant knew of the material facts
Truck Drivers Helpers, Local 170 v. N.L.R.B
993 F.2d 990 (1st Cir. 1993) Cited 21 timesNoting that the burden of showing reasonable diligence normally falls on the party seeking to toll the statute of limitations by alleging affirmative acts of concealment under the doctrine of fraudulent concealment
Alphin Aircraft, Inc. v. Henson
785 F.2d 304 (4th Cir. 1986) Cited 11 timesNo. 84-1871. Decided February 3, 1986. Appeal from D.Md. AFFIRMED.