§

Brown & Root-Northrop

177 N.L.R.B. 1 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Brown & Root-Northrop

9 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Lowell Sun Publishing Company

    320 F.2d 835 (1st Cir. 1963)   Cited 29 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Lowell Sun Publishing Co., 320 F.2d 835, 841 (1 Cir. 1963), the Board found that the company discharged an employee because of his union activity.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brown Root, Inc

    203 F.2d 139 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 29 times

    No. 14680. March 24, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 8, 1953. Harvey B. Diamond, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen., Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Owsley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. Ben H. Powell, Jr., Austin, Tex. (William A. Brown and Powell, Wirtz Rauhut, Austin, Tex., on the brief) for respondent Ozark Dam Constructors. Ben H.

  4. Hoover Design Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    402 F.2d 987 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 7 times
    In Hoover Design Corp. v. NLRB, 402 F.2d 987 (6th Cir. 1968), this Court ruled that the discharge of an employee for threatening to go to the Board or threatening to file charges with the Board did not constitute a violation of § 8(a)(4).

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Brown Root, Inc

    206 F.2d 73 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14680. July 8, 1953. Harvey B. Diamond, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Owsley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. Ben H. Powell, Jr., Austin, Tex. (William A. Brown and Powell, Wirtz Rauhut, Austin, Tex., on the brief) for respondent Ozark Dam Constructors. Ben H. Powell, Jr., Austin, Tex. (W. Morgan

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    327 F.2d 958 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 1 times

    No. 14680. February 20, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., William A. Brown, of Powell, Brown Maverick, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for petitioner. Powell, Brown Maverick, Houston, Tex., for respondents. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and BLACKMUN, Circuit Judges, and HENLEY, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This cause is now before the Court on Respondents' Motion for Clarification of our opinion of January 4, 1963, 311 F.2d 447, and for certain other relief. We are

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ozark Dam Const

    190 F.2d 222 (8th Cir. 1951)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14283. July 5, 1951. Rehearing Denied July 30, 1951. Owsley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marshall J. Seidman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Ben H. Powell, Jr., Austin, Tex. (A.J. Wirtz, William A. Brown and Powell, Wirtz Rauhut, Austin, Tex., on the brief), for respondents. Before SANBORN

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    318 F.2d 543 (8th Cir. 1963)

    No. 14680. June 14, 1963. William A. Brown, Houston, Tex., made argument for the respondents. William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for the petitioner. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and BLACKMUN, Circuit Judges, and HENLEY, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This cause is before the Court on the motion of respondents for a modification of our supplemental decree herein so as to order the payment by respondents of the sum of $533 to Betty Sue Bailey, the asserted widow of the apparently

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"