§
Brown Food Store

7 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  4. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

  5. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  6. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    270 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1959)   Cited 11 times
    In Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. NLRB, 270 F.2d 40, 43 (3d Cir. 1959), the court, in sustaining the Board's finding that a shut-down by the employer was not motivated by a fear that a sudden strike would endanger plant and personnel, stated that "to apply hindsight in the light of what later occurred would not be a true assessment of the company's motives.

  7. Utah Plumbing and Heating Con. v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.2d 165 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 5 times

    No. 6617. August 24, 1961. Louis H. Callister, Salt Lake City, Utah (Callister Fullmer, Salt Lake City, Utah, were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. Utah Plumbing and Heating Contractors Association, with its principal