Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 70

11 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Brown
380 U.S. 278 (1965) Cited 473 times 2 Legal Analyses
Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"
Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union
353 U.S. 87 (1957) Cited 197 times
Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947
Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Buono Sales
385 U.S. 971 (1966) Cited 66 times
No. 655. December 5, 1966. C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Frank C. O'Brien for petitioners. Samuel Carotenuto for respondents. Reported below: 363 F. 2d 43.
N.L.R.B. v. Sheridan Creations, Inc.
357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966) Cited 44 times
In NLRB v. Sheridan Creations, Inc., 357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1005, 87 S.Ct. 711, 17 L.Ed.2d 544 (1967), the employer contended that its attempted withdrawal from the multi-employer bargaining unit was authorized because three of its four employees desired not to be represented by the union.
General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B
412 F.2d 512 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 30 times
Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee
Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. N.L.R.B
372 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1967) Cited 21 times
In Detroit Newspaper Publishers Association v. NLRB, 372 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1967), the sole issue was not a union's disclaimer of any further representation of its members, but rather whether "two labor unions had the right to withdraw unilaterally from [a] multi-employer bargaining unit."
Publishers' Ass'n of New York City v. N.L.R.B
364 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1966) Cited 15 times
No. 383, Docket 30222. Argued May 31, 1966. Decided July 25, 1966. John R. Schoemer, Jr., New York City (Townley, Updike, Carter Rodgers, New York City, on the brief), for petitioners. Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George H. Cohen, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. John J. Sheehan, New York City, for
N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Banknote Company
281 F.2d 893 (9th Cir. 1960) Cited 18 times
No. 16700. September 6, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Richard J. Scupi, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., J.H. Doesburg, Jr., J.N. Goddess, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before ORR and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. Before the Court is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board dated September
Meat Cutters U. Local 81 of A.M.C. v. N.L.R.B
458 F.2d 794 (D.C. Cir. 1972) Cited 7 times
In Meat Cutters we considered this prior analysis of the 1947 legislative history and concluded that "[a] supervisor's obligations to his union simply cannot detract from the absolute duty, evidenced by section 8(b)(1)(B), which he owes to his employer when exercising his managerial authority."
Cheney California Lumber Company v. N.L.R.B
319 F.2d 375 (9th Cir. 1963) Cited 14 times
No. 17677. June 18, 1963. Comfort, Dolack Hansler, and John Hansler, Tacoma, Wash., for petitioner. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin and Stephen B. Goldberg, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before JERTBERG and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and PENCE, District Judge. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. Cheney California Lumber Company, engaged in business in Greenville, California, filed

Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 70

11 Cited authorities

Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee

In Detroit Newspaper Publishers Association v. NLRB, 372 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1967), the sole issue was not a union's disclaimer of any further representation of its members, but rather whether "two labor unions had the right to withdraw unilaterally from [a] multi-employer bargaining unit."

In Meat Cutters we considered this prior analysis of the 1947 legislative history and concluded that "[a] supervisor's obligations to his union simply cannot detract from the absolute duty, evidenced by section 8(b)(1)(B), which he owes to his employer when exercising his managerial authority."