ยง

Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 70

194 N.L.R.B. 674 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 70

7 Cited authorities

  1. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  2. Rabouin v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    195 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 75 times
    In Rabouin v. N.L.R.B., 195 F.2d 906 (2nd Cir., 1962), Justice Clark, then a Circuit Judge, specifically held that a union's demand for damages equal in amount to the wages paid a non-union driver was not an attempted exaction in violation of ยง 8(b)(6).

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Sheridan Creations, Inc.

    357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 44 times
    In NLRB v. Sheridan Creations, Inc., 357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1005, 87 S.Ct. 711, 17 L.Ed.2d 544 (1967), the employer contended that its attempted withdrawal from the multi-employer bargaining unit was authorized because three of its four employees desired not to be represented by the union.

  4. Roadway Express v. Gen. Teamsters

    330 F.2d 859 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 38 times
    In Roadway Express, Inc. v. General Teamsters, 330 F.2d 859, decided in this Circuit in 1964, a similar situation arose involving several proposed agreements, negotiations pursuant thereto and an alleged telegraphic acceptance.

  5. Hamilton Foundry M. v. Int'l M. F. Wkrs

    193 F.2d 209 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 56 times
    In Hamilton Foundry Machine Co. v. International Moulders Foundry Workers, 193 F.2d 209 (6th Cir. 1952), Section 158(d) of 29 U.S.C.A. was interpreted to mean that valid oral agreements were proper in collective bargaining contracts so long as neither party requested a written instrument containing its terms.

  6. Publishers' Ass'n of New York City v. N.L.R.B

    364 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 15 times

    No. 383, Docket 30222. Argued May 31, 1966. Decided July 25, 1966. John R. Schoemer, Jr., New York City (Townley, Updike, Carter Rodgers, New York City, on the brief), for petitioners. Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George H. Cohen, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. John J. Sheehan, New York City, for

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Banknote Company

    281 F.2d 893 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 18 times

    No. 16700. September 6, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Richard J. Scupi, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., J.H. Doesburg, Jr., J.N. Goddess, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before ORR and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. Before the Court is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board dated September