Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers of America

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  2. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Serv. Trade C

    191 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 44 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, etc., supra, it was said: "We take this to mean that a union may lawfully inflict harm on a neutral employer, without violating ยง 8 (b) (4), so long as the harm is merely incidental to a traditionally lawful primary strike, conducted at the place where the primary employer does business."
  4. National Lab. R. Bd. v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters

    212 F.2d 216 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 28 times

    No. 11045. April 21, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Alvin Lieberman, Atty., N.L.R.B., New York City, for petitioner. Ralph B. Gregg, Edward J. Fillenwarth, Indianapolis, Ind., Gregg, Fillion, Fillenwarth Hughes, Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel, for respondent. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Chief Judge. This case