Brookside Industries, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McCatron

    216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McCatron, 216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. den., 1955, 348 U.S. 943, 75 S.Ct. 365, 99 L.Ed. 738, strikers acted in the good faith but mistaken belief that a fellow employee, whose reinstatement they sought, had been discharged because of union activities.
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Inter-City Adv. Co.

    190 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 12 times

    No. 6226. Argued June 11, 1951. Decided July 16, 1951. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel; David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel; A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondents. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER

  6. National Labor Bd. v. Braswell Motor Freight

    213 F.2d 208 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 3 times

    No. 14663. June 4, 1954. Rehearing Denied August 6, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, James R. Webster, Fort Worth, Tex., Samuel M. Singer, Peter Bauer, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Cecil A. Morgan, Sam R. Sayers, Morgan Shropshire, Rawlings, Sayers, Scurlock Eidson, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. PER