§

Bronx Metal Polishing Co., Inc.

276 N.L.R.B. 299 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Bronx Metal Polishing Co., Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 416 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Jacob E. Decker and Sons

    569 F.2d 357 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that "new evidence" discovered after trial does not warrant a new trial when its only purpose would be to impeach a witness

  4. United States v. Bosley

    615 F.2d 1274 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 25 times
    Finding proper a ruling that a prior delivery of cocaine by the defendant outside the scope of the charged conspiracy was inadmissible to prove the defendant's association with the conspiracy

  5. United States v. Ling

    581 F.2d 1118 (4th Cir. 1978)   Cited 21 times
    In Ling, however, "[t]here was no link between the rebuttal testimony... and an element of the crime charged"; rather, "the only purpose of [that testimony was] to impeach the defendant's credibility and prejudice the jury against him."

  6. Artra Group, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    730 F.2d 586 (10th Cir. 1984)   Cited 8 times

    No. 82-1727. March 15, 1984. Ira Michael Shepard, Washington, D.C. (Paul Monroe Heylman, Washington, D.C., with him on briefs; Schmeltzer, Aptaker Sheppard, P.C., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Lawrence E. Blatnik, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for respondent. Carole

  7. United States v. Cluck

    544 F.2d 195 (5th Cir. 1976)   Cited 13 times

    No. 76-2895. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. December 16, 1976. Roland E. Dahlin, II, Fed. Public Defender, Karen K. Friedman, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Houston, Tex., Juan E. Gavito, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Brownsville, Tex., for defendant-appellant. Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U.S. Atty., Anna E. Stool, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the

  8. Tama Meat Packing Corp v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    575 F.2d 661 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 3 times

    No. 77-1573. Submitted February 15, 1978. Decided May 12, 1978. Fred W. Elarbee, Atlanta, Ga., argued, for petitioner; Elarbee, Clark Paul, Atlanta, Ga., on brief. Lynne Deitch, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent; Marjorie S. Gofreed, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Howard Johnson Co.

    637 F.2d 373 (5th Cir. 1981)

    No. 80-2004. Summary Calendar. February 17, 1981. Elliott Moore, Karen J. Ward, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsels, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Richard A. Gaucher, and Kevin B. Callanan, Braintree, Mass., Sam A. LeBlanc, III, and D. Michael Dendy, New Orleans, La., for Howard Johnson Co. W. Edwin Youngblood, Dir., Region 16, N.L.R.B., Fort Worth, Tex., for other interested parties. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWN, POLITZ and TATE

  10. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 29,633 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."

  11. Rule 609 - Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction

    Fed. R. Evid. 609   Cited 4,534 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a ten-year time limit, absent unusual circumstances, on the use of prior convictions for impeachment purposes

  12. Rule 608 - A Witness's Character for Truthfulness or Untruthfulness

    Fed. R. Evid. 608   Cited 3,074 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Assuming it was otherwise admissible