Bristol Convalescent Home, Inc

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
  3. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  5. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. U.S.

    226 U.S. 20 (1912)   Cited 155 times
    Holding patent rights do not apply to preempt price-fixing restrictions imposed by the Sherman Act
  6. Local Union 1395, Intern. Broth. v. N.L.R.B

    797 F.2d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 50 times
    Adopting this section of the Restatement
  7. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
  8. Gary Hobart Water Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    511 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 26 times
    In Gary Hobart, not only was the contract lacking any acknowledgement of the industrial necessity to avoid work stoppages, but the no-strike clause and the grievance and arbitration procedures of the contract were fundamentally related.
  9. United States Steel Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    711 F.2d 772 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that "in cases where an arbitration clause and an express no-strike clause are closely interwoven, it may be reasonable to infer that the parties intended the two provisions to have the same scope," but where the no-strike clause is "functionally independent" of the arbitration clause no such inference arises
  10. Amcar Division, ACF Industries Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    641 F.2d 561 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 15 times
    In Amcar Division ACF Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 641 F.2d 561 (8th Cir. 1981), the Eighth Circuit found that employees may waive their right to engage in sympathy strikes.
  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions