Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P.

22 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,983 times   605 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"
  2. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 982 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law
  3. BEK CONSTR. CO. v. NLRB

    536 U.S. 516 (2002)   Cited 314 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts
  4. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 142 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced
  5. Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP

    726 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 138 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that class action waivers must be enforced absent a "contrary congressional command"
  6. Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc.

    702 F.3d 1050 (8th Cir. 2013)   Cited 119 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Finding plaintiff failed to identify anything "in either the text or legislative history of the FLSA that indicates a congressional intent to bar employees from agreeing to arbitrate FLSA claims individually, nor is there an 'inherent conflict' between the FLSA and the FAA"
  7. Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 97 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029

    409 U.S. 213 (1972)   Cited 53 times
    In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.
  9. Booster Lodge No. 405, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    412 U.S. 84 (1973)   Cited 35 times
    Holding the court of appeals may not properly overrule a decision of the Supreme Court in order to force its reconsideration
  10. Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 17 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally