§
Brighton Bakery

10 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,658 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. International Bhd. of Op. Potters v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times

    Nos. 17300, 17463. Argued May 1, 1963. Decided June 13, 1963. Mr. Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff and Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 17300 and intervenor in No. 17463. Mr. Theo. F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., with whom Mr. William B. Devaney, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 17463 and intervenor in No. 17300. Mr. Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Supreme

  3. Confectionery and Tobacco Drivers v. N.L.R.B

    312 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 17 times
    Finding condonation

  4. Hawaii Meat Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 397 (9th Cir. 1963)   Cited 13 times
    Recognizing a union incentive to delay bargaining over a subcontract to replace strikers makes a bargaining requirement inappropriate

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  6. Rapid Roller Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    126 F.2d 452 (7th Cir. 1942)   Cited 31 times
    In Rapid Roller Co. v. NLRB, 126 F.2d 452, 457-60 (7th Cir. 1942), the court determined that transferring employees from department to department constituted a condition of employment that required collective bargaining.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Abbott Publishing Company

    331 F.2d 209 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14248. April 14, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ira M. Lechner, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph Z. Willner, George N. Leighton, Chicago, Ill., McCoy, Ming Leighton, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for respondent. Before DUFFY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges, and MERCER, District Judge. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations Board, by its petition

  8. N.L.R.B. v. I. Posner, Inc.

    304 F.2d 773 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 6 times

    No. 332, Docket 27342. Submitted April 23, 1962. Decided July 3, 1962. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Leo N. McGuire, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Leight, Drimmer Weinstein, New York City, and Murray A. Frank, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Burton H. Zuckerman, New York City, of counsel), for respondents. Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. SMITH, Circuit

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Poultrymen's Serv

    138 F.2d 204 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 21 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In N.L.R.B. v. Poultrymen's Service Corp., 138 F.2d 204 (3d Cir. 1943), a group of employees had been on strike for an extended period following their employer's refusal to bargain and recognize their union.

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters

    230 F.2d 256 (1st Cir. 1956)   Cited 3 times

    No. 5037. Heard December 6, 1955. Decided February 28, 1956. Harold Kowal, Field Atty., Boston, Mass., with whom Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., Attys., were on brief, for petitioner. Sidney W. Wernick, Portland, Me., with whom Berman, Berman Wernick, Portland, Me., were on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN