§

Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

337 N.L.R.B. 133 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

  2. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  3. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Roll & Hold Warehouse & Distribution Corp.

    162 F.3d 513 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 9 times
    Finding company undermined union by presenting plan to employees before notifying union

  5. Mead Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    697 F.2d 1013 (11th Cir. 1983)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that withdrawal with out good cause of a tentatively agreed upon proposal was evidence of bad faith

  6. TNT USA Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    208 F.3d 362 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 99-4124(L), 99-4152(XAP). Argued: March 13, 2000. Decided: March 27, 2000. Petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding that petitioner bargained with intervenor in bad faith on August 27, 1993, and ordering petitioner (1) to reinstate its proposal for a collective-bargaining agreement as it stood prior to its withdrawal in bad faith; (2) to sign an agreement, if the reinstated proposal is accepted by intervenor; and (3) to give the agreement retroactive effect

  7. Poole Foundry Mach. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Poole the court upheld the Board's bargaining order, concluding that the employer's withdrawal of recognition of the union based on a decertification petition signed by sixty-four of sixty-six employees within four months of the employer's settlement agreement with the union violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.