§
BOZZUTO'S, INC.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Staub v. Proctor Hosp.

    562 U.S. 411 (2011)   Cited 1,393 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a person who "did not intend to cause dismissal" cannot be deemed "responsible" for the dismissal, even if the dismissal was the "result" or "foreseeable consequence" of the person's actions

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  6. Carey Salt Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    736 F.3d 405 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 10 times
    Noting that it's not true that "any kind of extended concession, despite rejection and remote chances of fueling future talks, precludes impasse"

  7. N. Mem'l Health Care v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    860 F.3d 639 (8th Cir. 2017)   Cited 6 times

    No. 16-3433 No. 16-3657 06-21-2017 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. North Memorial Health Care, Respondent Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the petitioner/cross-respondent was Thomas R. Trachsel, of Minneapolis, MN. In addition to Mr. Trachsel, the following attorney(s) appeared on the petitioner/cross-respondent brief—Meggen E. Lindsay, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on

  8. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  9. Federated Logistics Operations v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 03-1323, 03-1357. Argued September 14, 2004. Decided February 25, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Meir Feder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Andrew M. Kramer and Julia M. Broas. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  10. Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    115 F.3d 636 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 94-70192, 94-70262 Argued and Submitted August 18, 1995 — San Francisco, California. Filed May 15, 1997 Robert G. Hulteng, Jeffrey S. Bosley, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy Mathiason, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner-cross-respondent, Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. Charles Donnelly, John J. Fawley, Washington, DC, for respondent-cross-petitioner, National Labor Relations Board. John J. Davis, Jr., McCarthy, Johnson Miller, San Francisco, CA, for respondent-intervenor, U.S. Local 350