§
Bowring v. Comm'r

12 Cited authorities

  1. Cromwell v. County of Sac

    94 U.S. 351 (1876)   Cited 1,577 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding for the purpose of res judicata that, because the two suits involved separate contracts, a prior suit for recovery of coupons attached to bonds did not involve the same claim as a later suit for recovery of later maturing coupons attached to the same bonds

  2. United States v. Katz

    271 U.S. 354 (1926)   Cited 193 times
    In United States v. Katz, 271 U.S. 354, this Court held that § 10 is one of a group of sections, including § 6, which apply only to those dealing in liquor for purposes authorized by the Act.

  3. United States v. Wong Kim Ark

    169 U.S. 649 (1898)   Cited 306 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the legislative power to prescribe a uniform rule of naturalization reaches to the bestowal of United States citizenship upon foreigners and upon foreign-born children of United States citizens alike

  4. U.S. v. Stone Downer Co.

    274 U.S. 225 (1927)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that in customs classification cases a determination of fact or law with respect to one importation is not res judicata as to another importation of the same merchandise by the same parties

  5. Kansas City So. Ry. v. Trust Co.

    281 U.S. 1 (1930)   Cited 72 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 22. Argued January 15, 16, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. 1. When used without qualification in a decree of a federal court, the word "costs" means the amounts taxable as such under Acts of Congress, rules promulgated by its authority and practice established consistently with governing enactments. P. 9. 2. In equity costs not otherwise governed by statute are given or withheld in the sound discretion of the court according

  6. Crawford v. Burke

    195 U.S. 176 (1904)   Cited 141 times
    Explaining that "a change in phraseology creates a presumption of a change in intent" and that "Congress would not have used such different language [in two statutes] without thereby intending a change of meaning"

  7. In re Chapman, Petitioner

    166 U.S. 661 (1897)   Cited 173 times
    Recognizing that Congress "necessarily possesses the inherent power of self-protection"

  8. Nagle v. Loi Hoa

    275 U.S. 475 (1928)   Cited 9 times
    In Nagle v. Loi Hoa, 275 U.S. 475, 48 S. Ct. 160, 72 L. Ed. 381, the Supreme Court had before it section 6 of the Chinese Exclusion Act (8 USCA § 265), providing for the identification of a Chinese person intending to enter the United States, by the Chinese government or "such other foreign government of which at the time such Chinese person" should "be a subject."

  9. Wolsey v. Chapman

    101 U.S. 755 (1879)   Cited 47 times

    OCTOBER TERM, 1879. 1. It has been settled in this court that the title of the Des Moines Navigation and Railroad Company to the lands donated to the State of Iowa for the improvement of the Des Moines River by the act of Aug. 8, 1846 ( 9 Stat. 77), is good against the State, the railroad companies claiming under the act of May 15, 1856 (11 id. 9), and, after 1855, as against pre-emptors under the act of Sept. 4, 1841. 5 id. 453. 2. The order of the Secretary of the Interior of April 6, 1850, directing

  10. Hennessy v. Richardson Drug Co.

    189 U.S. 25 (1903)   Cited 7 times

    APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 203. Argued March 12, 1903. Decided March 23, 1903. An averment in a bill that the complainants are "all of Cognac in France, and citizens of the Republic of France," is sufficient to give the Circuit Court of the United States for Nebraska jurisdiction in a controversy where the defendants are citizens of Nebraska. No averment of alienage is necessary. Where the Circuit Court dismisses a bill on the ground that