Boston & Associates, LLC

19 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,693 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Financial Institution Employees, Local 1182

    475 U.S. 192 (1986)   Cited 76 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that labor law prohibits the assignment or transfer of a collective bargaining agreement against the wishes of the workers for whom the agreement provides representation
  4. Bockes v. Fields

    510 U.S. 1092 (1994)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 93-818. January 24, 1994, October TERM, 1993. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 999 F. 2d 788.

  5. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice
  6. Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    330 F.3d 531 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that contractual language alone cannot establish a § 9 relationship where the union actually lacks majority support
  7. Strand Theatre v. N.L.R.B

    493 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that presenting a union with a ` fait accompli . . . unilaterally inform[ing] the [u]nion that position had already been eliminated" violated a union's right to bargaining provided by the Act
  8. N.L.R.B. v. General Fabrications Corp.

    222 F.3d 218 (6th Cir. 2000)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding the NLRB is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged portions of orders
  9. Haas Electric, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    299 F.3d 23 (1st Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that employer's letter expressed an unequivocal intent to terminate collective bargaining relationship even though it “admittedly did not use precise language in articulating its intent to withdraw”
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Triple C Maintenance, Inc.

    219 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing voluntary recognition under the National Labor Relations Act