§

Bosch, Robert, Corporation

256 N.L.R.B. 1036 (N.L.R.B. 1981)
Bosch, Robert, Corporation

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Kaiser Agr. Chem., Div. of Kaiser

    473 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 37 times

    No. 72-1379. February 2, 1973. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Walter C. Phillips, Director, Thaddeus R. Sobieski, Region 10, N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. John E. McFall, Andrew C. Partee, Jr., New Orleans, La., for respondent. Petition for enforcement from the National Labor Relations Board. Before RIVES, WISDOM and RONEY, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Ridgeway Trucking Co.

    622 F.2d 1222 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 24 times
    In NLRB v. Ridgeway Trucking Co., 622 F.2d 1222, 1223-24 (5th Cir. 1980), we stated that "[t]he test of whether an employee was discharged depends upon the reasonable inferences that the employees could draw from the language used by the employer."

  5. Mueller Brass Co. v. N.L.R.B

    544 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 26 times
    Involving more intrusive questioning against a clear history of strenuous anti-union activity

  6. Daniel Construction Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 805 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 36 times
    In Daniel Construction Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 805, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 831, 86 S.Ct. 70, 15 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965), this court considered the identical question presented here. The Board, having found that the company had violated section 8(a) (1) during the course of an election campaign and that such conduct had interfered with the employees' free choice, set the election aside, and ordered that a new election be held. The company sought review of both matters in this court.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. A. Lasaponara Sons, Inc.

    541 F.2d 992 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 15 times
    Stating that a work stoppage was a protected strike because, unlike extreme cases of economic coercion like Marshall Car Wheel , "the economic pressure ... clearly failed to reach a degree so grossly disproportionate to the goal sought to be achieved that it renders the conduct unprotected"

  8. Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  9. N.L.R.B. v. General Tel. Directory

    602 F.2d 912 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 8 times

    No. 78-1218. August 22, 1979. Lawrence Blatnik (argued), Elliott Moore (on brief), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. for petitioner. Renato J. Della Rocca, Marina Del Rey, Cal., on brief, for respondent. On Application to Review Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before TRASK and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and HOFFMAN, District Judge. Honorable Walter E. Hoffman, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. WALTER E. HOFFMAN

  10. Automation v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.2d 141 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 17771, 18038. August 30, 1968. John O. Henry, Dayton, Ohio, for petitioner; Hubert A. Estabrook, Francis X. Lee, Dayton, Ohio, on brief; Estabrook, Finn McKee, Thomas B. Kreutz, Ernest T. Hix, Dayton, Ohio, of counsel. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and