Bonita Nurseries, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 327 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Carducci v. Regan

    714 F.2d 171 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 495 times
    Holding limited to non-constitutional claims
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.

    516 U.S. 85 (1995)   Cited 85 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding "employee," as defined by the NLRA, "does not exclude paid union organizers"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.

    691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 341 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"
  7. Konstantinidis v. Chen

    626 F.2d 933 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 262 times
    Holding that Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, and Angel v. Bullington, 330 U.S. 183, 67 S.Ct. 657, 91 L.Ed. 832, "compel us to look to [state] law"
  8. F.T.C. v. World Travel Vacation Brokers, Inc.

    861 F.2d 1020 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 141 times
    Holding that the district court had power to grant a preliminary injunction under § 13(b) because Congress did not limit the court's inherent equitable powers
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Western Temporary Services, Inc.

    821 F.2d 1258 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 48 times
    Finding a joint employer relationship where the company could "refuse a referral" but also where the company had "exclusive control over the day-to-day activities of the part-time workers who [were] referred to it" including "train[ing], assign[ing] work, and supervis[ing] them."
  10. United Food Com. Wkrs. v. Food Employers

    827 F.2d 519 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 13 times
    Explaining that the Declaratory Judgment Act created "a new remedy," and put "a new implement at the disposal of the courts"