§

BOMA/CHICAGO

13-CE-000127 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 21, 2007)
BOMA/CHICAGO

21 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  3. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters

    429 U.S. 507 (1977)   Cited 138 times
    Stating that if a union were to attempt to capture work it had previously acquiesced to non-union workers' performing, such conduct would serve "not to preserve, but to aggrandize, its own position and that of its members," concluding that "[s]uch activity is squarely within the statute" and thus prohibited

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    447 U.S. 490 (1980)   Cited 65 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Longshoremen, 447 U.S. 490 (1980) (ILA I), we reviewed the National Labor Relations Board's conclusion that the Rules and their enforcement constituted unlawful secondary activity under §§ 8(b)(4)(B) and 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4) (B) and 158(e).

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    473 U.S. 61 (1985)   Cited 53 times
    Explaining that collective bargaining agreement cannot seek "to achieve union objectives outside the primary employer-employee relationship"

  7. Wiseman v. Massachusetts

    398 U.S. 960 (1970)   Cited 46 times
    Upholding injunction enjoining commercialization of documentary on conditions in institution for the criminally insane. Film was an outrageous and "indecent intrusion into the most private aspects of the [inmate's] lives."

  8. Bermuda Cont. v. Intern. Longshoremen's Ass'n

    192 F.3d 250 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that union's grievance to enforce subcontracting prohibition under multi-employer, multi-port longshore agreement was lawful under NLRA because bargaining unit was comprised of union-represented employees on a “coast-wide basis” and union's grievance and interpretation of agreement sought to “preserve the work of [union] employees in the coast-wide bargaining unit and was directed at [the employer] by virtue of its status in the multi-employer bargaining association.”

  9. Danielson v. Int'l Or. of Mast., M. P

    521 F.2d 747 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 29 times
    Discussing standards for § 10( l) injunction

  10. Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    335 F.2d 709 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    Subcontracting in cases of lack of equipment to companies employing members of same local whenever possible

  11. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,062 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB