§

Bolivar Tee's Mfg. Co.

334 N.L.R.B. 1145 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Bolivar Tee's Mfg. Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. National Labor Rel. v. Taylor Mach. Prods

    136 F.3d 507 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 96-6047 Argued: December 11, 1997 Decided and Filed: February 18, 1998 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 ARGUED: Anthony A. Asher, SULLIVAN, WARD, BONE, TYLER ASHER, Southfield, Michigan, for Respondent. David Habenstreit, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. ON BRIEF: Ronald S. Lederman, Scott D. Norton, SULLIVAN, WARD, BONE, TYLER ASHER, Southfield, Michigan, for Respondent. David Habenstreit, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, OFFICE

  4. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

    705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 81-1693. October 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jacob Oliner, Oliner Oliner, New York City, for respondent. Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY, KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges. ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the motion of the intervenor, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, for an order enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in Limestone

  6. TLC Lines, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    717 F.2d 461 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 2 times

    No. 82-2561. Submitted September 13, 1983. Decided September 27, 1983. Lewis, Rice, Tucker, Allen Chubb, John J. Gazzoli, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner TLC Lines, Inc. Petition for review of an order of National Labor Relations Board. Before HEANEY and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges, and HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) found that petitioner TLC Lines, Inc. (TLC), violated subsections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Noll Motors, Inc.

    433 F.2d 853 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 6 times
    In Noll Motors, for example, the court said: "Clearly, the president's statements, the interrogations and the manager's statements considered as a whole justified the Board's findings of coercion and restraint.

  8. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,338 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355