Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc.

7 Cited authorities

American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board
380 U.S. 300 (1965) Cited 350 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful
Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.
369 U.S. 404 (1962) Cited 298 times
Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
Bourne v. N.L.R.B
332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 93 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
Local 702, I.B.E.W. v. N.L.R.B
215 F.3d 11 (D.C. Cir. 2000) Cited 17 times
Nos. 99-1137, 99-1139 Argued January 19, 2000 Decided May 9, 2000 On Petitions for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Marilyn S. Teitelbaum argued the cause for the petitioners in Nos. 99-1137 and 99-1139. Stacey A. Meyers was on brief for Local 702, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, the petitioner in No. 99-1137. Cary Hammond and Greg A. Campbell were on brief for petitioner International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 148, AFL-CIO in No. 99-1139
In re Dietz
633 A.2d 850 (D.C. 1993) Cited 22 times
No. 92-SP-1257. Submitted November 1, 1993. Decided November 29, 1993. Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, SCHWELB, Associate Judge, and REILLY, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM: Stanley Dietz, Esq. was retained to represent Mary E. Brown in her divorce. Dietz neglected the case. He also failed to return the $500 fee which Mrs. Brown had paid him, and he did not respond to Mrs. Brown's inquiries or return her calls. After Bar Counsel instituted disciplinary proceedings, Dietz initially ignored them and failed to
Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B
760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 26 times 6 Legal Analyses
Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
American Brake Shoe v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
244 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1957) Cited 9 times
In American Brake Shoe Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 244 F.2d 489, we recognized that the right to engage in a lawful strike is a protected concerted activity.

Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc.

7 Cited authorities

American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

Bourne v. N.L.R.B

In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

Local 702, I.B.E.W. v. N.L.R.B

In re Dietz

Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

American Brake Shoe v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

In American Brake Shoe Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 244 F.2d 489, we recognized that the right to engage in a lawful strike is a protected concerted activity.