§

Bmd Sportswear Corp. And Suzan Knitwear Corp., As Alter Egos And As A Single Employer

283 N.L.R.B. 142 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Bmd Sportswear Corp. And Suzan Knitwear Corp., As Alter Egos And As A Single Employer

8 Cited authorities

  1. Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    804 F.2d 808 (3d Cir. 1986)   Cited 422 times
    Timing and departure from past practice indicates unlawful motive

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  4. Carpenters Local U #1846 v. Pratt-Farnsworth

    690 F.2d 489 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that a § 301 claim for breach of contract may be stated under an alter ego theory where the defendant had not signed the CBA

  5. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Permanent Label Corp.

    657 F.2d 512 (3d Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times
    Discussing independence of ALJs

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    488 F.2d 114 (8th Cir. 1973)   Cited 14 times

    No. 73-1246. Submitted October 16, 1973. Decided December 4, 1973. William H. Bruckner, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. Marjory Gofreed, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Before LAY and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and EISELE, District Judge. G. Thomas Eisele, District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation. LAY, Circuit Judge. The sole issue presented is whether there exists substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's finding that Wal-Mart

  8. Sturdevant Sheet Metal Roofing v. N.L.R.B

    636 F.2d 271 (10th Cir. 1980)   Cited 2 times

    No. 79-1019. Argued September 17, 1980. Decided November 20, 1980. Douglas G. Voeglar, Albuquerque, N. M. (Leonard L. Pickering and Wayne E. Bingham, of Pickering Bingham, Albuquerque, N. M., with him on the brief), for petitioners. L. Joseph Ferrara, Atty., Washington, D.C. (William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R