Blue Plate Catering, Ltd. v. Seminole Tribe of Florida

6 Cited authorities

  1. Specht v. Google Inc.

    747 F.3d 929 (7th Cir. 2014)   Cited 53 times
    Holding that once a trademark was abandoned it returned to the public domain, could be appropriated anew, and [defendant] became the senior user.
  2. Specht v. Google Inc.

    758 F. Supp. 2d 570 (N.D. Ill. 2010)   Cited 37 times
    Concluding plaintiff's maintenance of a "ghost site" "a functional yet almost purposeless website," could not "prevent abandonment of a mark"
  3. Ritchie v. Simpson

    170 F.3d 1092 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding “real interest” is shown by “a direct and personal stake in the outcome” or a “legitimate personal interest.”
  4. University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co.

    703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 19 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., 703 F.2d 1372, 1376, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. Cir. 1983), the court added that section 2(a) embraces concepts of the right to privacy which may be violated even in the absence of likelihood of confusion.
  5. Old Swiss House, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch

    569 F.2d 1130 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 8 times
    Rejecting news articles as evidence of "prior use" because the mark "was buried in the body of the articles"
  6. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,585 times   271 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"