§

Blossom Nursing Center

299 N.L.R.B. 333 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Blossom Nursing Center

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 221 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.

    442 U.S. 773 (1979)   Cited 71 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding solicitation ban in corridors and sitting rooms

  5. Peabody Coal Co. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 357 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 21 times
    Finding section 8 violation

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Harper-Grace Hospitals, Inc.

    737 F.2d 576 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 4 times

    No. 83-5338. Argued May 1, 1984. Decided June 28, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John Rubin (argued), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Stewart Katz (argued), Keller, Thoma, Schwarze, Schwarze, DuBay Katz, Robert Sawicki, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before JONES and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge. CONTIE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) petitions for enforcement of an order holding that Harper-Grace Hospitals, Inc