Bloomsburg Craftsmen, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
  3. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
  4. Mon River Towing, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    421 F.2d 1 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 27 times
    Recognizing that the involvement of supervisory union members in union affairs conflicts with "the need to assure the complete devotion of union negotiating teams to employee interests"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Biederman Furniture Company

    397 F.2d 282 (8th Cir. 1968)   Cited 1 times

    No. 19100. July 11, 1968. Rehearing Denied August 12, 1968. Gaylord C. Burke of Bryan, Cave, McPheeters McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., made argument and filed brief for the respondent, Biederman Furniture Co. Robert E. Williams, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for the Labor Board, Petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with Robert E.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Mackneish

    272 F.2d 184 (6th Cir. 1959)   Cited 3 times

    No. 13796. November 9, 1959. Thomas J. McDermott, Washington, D.C., argued by William Avrutis, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David Colman, Detroit, Mich., Joseph V. Wilcox, Albion, Mich., argued by David Colman, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and CECIL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board found that respondents, in this case, by lockout, permanent shutdown, transfer of operations, and refusal to negotiate with the Union involved

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Electronics Company

    302 F.2d 145 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 1 times

    No. 14725. May 3, 1962. Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Judith Bleich Kahn, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. S.J. Milligan, Milligan, Silvers Coleman, Greenville, Tenn., for respondent. Before MILLER, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board found that respondent