Bldg. & Const. Trades Council of Ventura County
3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.
318 U.S. 9 (1943) Cited 108 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."
Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. N.L.R.B
326 F.2d 634 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 15 timesNo. 17058. Argued March 14, 1963. Decided November 14, 1963. Mr. George Kaufmann, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., and Robert A. Wilson, Cincinnati, Ohio, were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Norton J. Come, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gottfried Baking
210 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1954) Cited 24 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Gottfried Baking Co., 210 F.2d 772 (2 Cir., 1954), this court considered and rejected the same argument on nearly identical facts: "We think it is unimportant whether or not the Association existed as a formal entity, so long as it is clear that [the employer] acted jointly with other employers in the Association in the negotiation of collective agreements, as the impact upon interstate commerce would be the same in either case."