§

Blades Manufacturing Corp.

144 N.L.R.B. 561 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Blades Manufacturing Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  2. Auto. Workers v. Wis. Board

    336 U.S. 245 (1949)   Cited 209 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that issuance of injunction by state labor relations authority that orders state employees back to work does not violate Thirteenth Amendment because employees had the right to quit employment

  3. Local 833, Uaw-Afl-Cio, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    300 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 40 times

    Nos. 15961, 16031, 16182. Argued September 11, 1961. Decided January 26, 1962. Certiorari Denied June 4, 1962. See 82 S.Ct. 1258. Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., and Mr. Louis H. Pollak, New Haven, Conn., of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. John Silard, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for Local 833, UAW-AFL-CIO, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, petitioner

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thayer Co.

    213 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 40 times
    In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Lundy Manufacturing Corporation

    316 F.2d 921 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 6 times

    No. 27730. Argued March 27, 1963. Decided April 26, 1963. Hans J. Lehmann, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Harold Dublirer, New York City (Dublirer Haydon, New York City), for respondent. Before CLARK, WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge. The National Relations Board asks us to enforce an order, 136 NLRB No. 128, made in a proceeding in which