§

Blackberry Creek Trucking, Inc And Mate Creek Trucking, Inc

291 N.L.R.B. 474 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Blackberry Creek Trucking, Inc And Mate Creek Trucking, Inc

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Insurance Co. of America

    390 U.S. 254 (1968)   Cited 327 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"

  2. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 327 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Edward Cooper Painting, Inc.

    804 F.2d 934 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 169 times
    Holding that NLRB's unfair labor practices proceeding was exercise of government's police and regulatory power and therefore not subject to automatic stay

  5. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Vulcan-Hart Corp.

    642 F.2d 255 (8th Cir. 1981)

    No. 80-1515. Submitted February 10, 1981. Decided March 9, 1981. Gerald Tockman, Charles W. Ahner, Jr. (argued), St. Louis, Mo., for respondent. Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before ROSS, HENLEY and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges. ROSS, Circuit Judge. In this case the National Labor Relations Board requests this court to enforce its order of April 17, 1980, in connection with an alleged unfair labor

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. M.P. Bldg. Corp.

    411 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 4 times

    No. 26473. May 14, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, Region 23, Houston, Tex., Ronald R. Helveston, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Michael N. Sohn, Burton L. Raimi, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Hugh G. Freeland, Lavon L. Jones, Beaumont, Tex., for respondents. Before BELL and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and CHOATE, Senior District Judge. PER CURIAM: This case is before the Court