Garment Workers v. Labor Board

Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sharples Chemicals

In NLRB v. Sharples Chemicals, Inc., 209 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1954), the respondent had submitted 53 proposed findings to the NLRB. Of such findings 20 were accepted by the Board and remainder rejected.

N.L.R.B. v. Henry Colder Company

Powers Regulator Company v. N.L.R.B

Finding Section 8 violation where defendant Company, through its supervisors and foremen, acted coercively to block formation of a new union