§

Bison Products, LLC v. Red Bull GmbH

92076894 (T.T.A.B. Feb. 2, 2022)
Bison Products, LLC v. Red Bull GmbH

18 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 265,381 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 278,528 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

  3. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

    572 U.S. 118 (2014)   Cited 3,011 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the respondent could not "obtain relief" under § 1125 "without evidence of injury proximately caused by [the petitioner's] alleged misrepresentations"

  4. Advanced Cardiovascular v. Scimed Life

    988 F.2d 1157 (Fed. Cir. 1993)   Cited 203 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in a Section 256 claim, laches cannot be decided at the pleading stage "based solely on presumptions"

  5. Belmora LLC v. Bayer Consumer Care AG

    987 F.3d 284 (4th Cir. 2021)   Cited 31 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 18-2183 No. 18-2232 02-02-2021 BELMORA LLC, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. BAYER CONSUMER CARE AG, a Swiss Corporation; Bayer Healthcare LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendants – Consolidated Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. Belmora LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company; Jamie Belcastro, an individual, Consolidated Defendants – Appellees, and Does, 1 – 10, inclusive, Consolidated Defendants. United States of America, Amicus Supporting Appellant. Belmora LLC, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. Bayer

  6. Australian Therapeutic Supplies Pty. v. Naked TM, LLC

    965 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2020)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that a petitioner did not have a valid cause of action because it was precluded by a prior settlement agreement

  7. Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.R.L

    808 F.2d 46 (Fed. Cir. 1986)   Cited 52 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming TTAB's cancellation of trademark for fraudulently obtaining registration

  8. Corcamore, LLC v. SFM, LLC

    978 F.3d 1298 (Fed. Cir. 2020)   Cited 9 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Lexmark controls the statutory cause of action analysis under § 1064

  9. Belmora, LLC. v. Bayer Consumer Care AG

    338 F. Supp. 3d 477 (E.D. Va. 2018)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00847 09-06-2018 BELMORA, LLC., Plaintiff, v. BAYER CONSUMER CARE AG, et al., Defendants-Consolidated Plaintiffs, v. Belmora, LLC, Jamie Belcastro, & Does 1-10, Inclusive, et al., Consolidated Defendants. Craig Crandall Reilly, Law Office of Craig C. Reilly, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff. Brent H. Blakely, Cindy W. Chan, Courtney L. Stuart-Alban, Blakely Law Group, Manhattan Beach, CA, Robert J. Shaughnessy, Eric Christopher Wiener, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC

  10. In re Bose Corp.

    476 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 11 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing in the context of administrative proceedings that courts should "exercise caution in applying claim preclusion in an ex parte proceeding"

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 359,902 times   954 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  12. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 3,016 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark

  13. Section 1064 - Cancellation of registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1064   Cited 918 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a petition to cancel a certification mark if the registered owner "discriminately refuses to certify" qualifying goods or services

  14. Section 1060 - Assignment

    15 U.S.C. § 1060   Cited 190 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Requiring assignments of federal trademark registrations to be "by instruments in writing"

  15. Section 1063 - Opposition to registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1063   Cited 147 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Identifying "dilution by blurring ... under section 1125(c) as a permissible grounds for opposition to a registration"