§

Birmingham Steel Corp. v. Beta Steel Corp.

No. 91088237 (T.T.A.B. Dec. 4, 1997)
Birmingham Steel Corp. v. Beta Steel Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 191 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  2. In re Electrolyte Laboratories, Inc

    929 F.2d 645 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot ignore the less dominant portion of a cited mark

  3. Canadian Imperial Bank v. Wells Fargo Bank

    811 F.2d 1490 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming likelihood of confusion

  4. Georgia-Pacific v. Great Plains Bag Co.

    614 F.2d 757 (C.C.P.A. 1980)   Cited 14 times
    Imputing knowledge of salespersons to corporation in trademark dispute

  5. Application of Burndy Corporation

    300 F.2d 938 (C.C.P.A. 1962)   Cited 10 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6736. April 11, 1962. Ernest Fanwick, Norwalk, Conn. (Robert I. Dennison, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge JOSEPH R. JACKSON, Retired. RICH, Judge. This appeal is from the affirmance by the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the ex parte rejection of appellant's application to register a trademark on the Principal

  6. Application of Anderson Electric Corp.

    370 F.2d 593 (C.C.P.A. 1967)   Cited 3 times

    Patent Appeal No. 7759. January 12, 1967. Donald G. Leavitt, St. Louis, Mo., J. Harold Kilcoyne, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D.C. (George C. Roeming, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK. Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. ARTHUR M. SMITH, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark

  7. Diamond Alkali Company v. Dundee Cement Co.

    343 F.2d 781 (C.C.P.A. 1965)   Cited 2 times

    Patent Appeal No. 7373. April 15, 1965. Boynton P. Livingston, Washington, D.C., (James L. Kurtz, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. L. Gaylord Hulbert, Detroit, Mich., for appellee. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges. MARTIN, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board wherein the board dismissed the opposition of the appellant, Diamond Alkali Company, which opposition was instituted against an application of

  8. Shunk Manufacturing Co. v. Tarrant Mfg. Co.

    318 F.2d 328 (C.C.P.A. 1963)   Cited 2 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6896. June 10, 1963. Frank M. Slough and J.H. Slough, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant. Luther W. Hawley, New York City, for appellee. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges. ALMOND, Judge, Appellant, Shunk Manufacturing Company, filed a trademark application to register a figure, designated as a Scotsman, as a trademark for heavy duty equipment, such as graders and other ground working machines, blades therefor, sand spreaders, etc. The trademark