§

Birkenwald Distributing Co.

282 N.L.R.B. 954 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Birkenwald Distributing Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Milhollin

    444 U.S. 555 (1980)   Cited 838 times
    Holding that deference was appropriate to official staff opinions of Federal Reserve Board interpreting the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z, unless demonstrably irrational

  2. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  3. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  5. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  6. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  7. House v. Mayo

    324 U.S. 42 (1945)   Cited 182 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In House v. Mayo, 324 U.S., at 44, involving the predecessors to §§ 1254(1) and 2253(c)(1), the statutorily required certificate was called a "certificate of probable cause" rather than a certificate of appealability, but the effect of failure to obtain it was precisely the same: The case could not proceed to the court of appeals.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  9. Inter-Collegiate Press, v. N.L.R.B

    486 F.2d 837 (8th Cir. 1973)   Cited 23 times

    Nos. 72-1573, 72-1749. Submitted September 10, 1973. Decided October 25, 1973. Alvin D. Shapiro, Kansas City, Mo., for Intercollegiate Press. William O. Eisler, Kansas City, Mo., for Bookbinders. William DuRoss, III, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before GIBSON and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Talbot Smith, Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

  10. D'Amico v. N.L.R.B

    582 F.2d 820 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 15 times
    In D'Amico, we adopted the Board's position that superseniority provisions for union officers "breach the neutrality mandated by the [NLRA] by tying the very substantial benefit of job retention to a particular type of membership in good standing — union activism to the extent of seeking to be elected a union officer."