Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. MONOSOL RX, LLC

10768809 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 13, 2013)
BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. MONOSOL RX, LLC

6 Cited authorities

  1. Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.

    721 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2013)   Cited 174 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding the cancelation of patent claims is binding in concurrent infringement litigation

  2. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Marchon Eyewear, Inc.

    672 F.3d 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 155 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an independent claim including the limitation "magnetic member" includes ferromagnetic material in addition to a magnet, in light of dependent claim limiting "magnetic member" to a magnet

  3. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 554 times   901 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent

  4. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 381 times   636 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  5. Section 307 - Certificate of patentability, unpatentability, and claim cancellation

    35 U.S.C. § 307   Cited 118 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Stating that “a reexamination proceeding will have the same effect as that specified in section 252 for reissued patents”

  6. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 46 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution