Bill's Institutional Commissary Corp.

3 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Bill's Institutional Commissary

    418 F.2d 405 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 12 times

    No. 27225. November 10, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Robert E. Williams, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., John F. LeBus, Dir., Region 15, N.L.R.B., New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Hobart Hector, Jr., Emile C. Ott, Charles Clark, Jackson, Miss., for respondent; Fuselier, Hector, Robertson Ott, Jackson, Miss., of counsel. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and JONES and CARSWELL, Circuit

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Bill's Institutional Commissary

    449 F.2d 694 (5th Cir. 1971)

    No. 71-1507. October 26, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Director, Region 15, N.L.R.B., New Orleans, La., William H. DuRoss, III, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Emile C. Ott, Vardaman S. Dunn, Fuselier, Hector Ott, Jackson, Miss., for respondent. Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges. BELL, Circuit Judge:

  3. Wallace v. State

    233 P. 241 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)   Cited 3 times

    No. A-4628. Opinion Filed February 14, 1925. (Syllabus.) Appeal and Error — Proceedings Presumed Regular — Burden on Appellant to Show Error and Injury. All presumptions are that the proceedings in a criminal case are regular and in conformity to law, and when an accused, on appeal, challenges the proceedings under which he was convicted, he must show affirmatively the irregularity of which he complains, and that he was injured thereby. Appeal from County Court, Cotton County; J.C. Norman, Judge