Bill's Coal Co., Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.
311 U.S. 584 (1941) Cited 338 times
Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
N.L.R.B. v. Birmingham Publishing Company
262 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 66 times
In NLRB v. Birmingham, supra, 262 F.2d at 6-8, an employee requested from company supervisors information on how to transfer to another union.
N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.
358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966) Cited 26 times
In Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.
Schwob Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B
297 F.2d 864 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 25 times
No. 18819. January 2, 1962. J. Madden Hatcher, Lee H. Henkel, Jr., Swift, Pease, Davidson Chapman, Columbus, Ga., for petitioner. Tom B. Slade, Hatcher, Smith, Stubbs Rothschild, Columbus, Ga., of counsel. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Judith Bleich Kahn, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BROWN, GEWIN and BELL, Circuit Judges. GEWIN, Circuit Judge. This case arises
N.L.R.B. v. Wichita Television Corporation
277 F.2d 579 (10th Cir. 1960) Cited 23 times
No. 6153. April 5, 1960. Rehearing Denied June 1, 1960. Duane B. Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., and Standau E. Weinbrecht, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George J. Bott, Washington, D.C., and Daniel M. Moyer, Wichita, Kan., for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. The
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.
120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941) Cited 15 times
No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,095 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Bill's Coal Co., Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

In NLRB v. Birmingham, supra, 262 F.2d at 6-8, an employee requested from company supervisors information on how to transfer to another union.

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"