§

Bill Scott Oldsmobile

282 N.L.R.B. 1073 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Bill Scott Oldsmobile

18 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  2. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  3. Retired Persons Pharmacy v. N.L.R.B

    519 F.2d 486 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 44 times
    Affirming an ALJ's decision not to permit an employer to call employees to testify about whether they supported the union as of the withdrawal date because the employer “would clearly have been putting pressure on them to answer favorably” and “[i]f such questioning were allowed, management could withdraw recognition without basis and successfully defend itself by showing a lack of union support which in fact resulted not from employee dissatisfaction but rather from the withdrawal of recognition and subsequent proceedings”

  4. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  5. Dayton Typographic Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    778 F.2d 1188 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 25 times
    Finding the employer's "lack of work" defense unconvincing where the employer hired two new employees to do part-time work in the same department as the discharged employee

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Martin A. Gleason, Inc.

    534 F.2d 466 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 29 times

    Nos. 106-108, Dockets 75-4018, 75-4045 and 75-4047. Argued November 10, 1975. Decided March 3, 1976. As Amended May 3, 1976. Janet C. McCaa, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner-respondent N. L. R. B. Alan D. Gallay, New York City (Fellner Rovins and Ronald Kreismann

  7. Standard-Coosa-Thatcher Carpet v. N.L.R.B

    691 F.2d 1133 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 19 times
    Enforcing the Board’s application of the per se rule

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Monroe Tube Co., Inc.

    545 F.2d 1320 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 19 times
    Ruling that employer did not interfere with employees' rights by advising them they could withdraw their union authorization cards and by supplying the address of the union headquarters for that purpose

  9. Intn'l United A., A. A. v. N.L.R.B

    392 F.2d 801 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times
    Expressing skepticism of “employees testifying under the eye of the company officials about events which occurred almost a year before”

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co.

    344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times   11 Legal Analyses
    In N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co., 8 Cir., 344 F.2d 617, we recognized that an employer has no vested right to insist that union representation be established by a Board conducted election but we further held that an employer acting in good faith belief that a union lacked majority representation was not required to recognize and bargain with the union until such doubt was resolved.