§

Bill O'Grady Carpet Service, Inc.

185 N.L.R.B. 587 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Bill O'Grady Carpet Service, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Sheridan Creations, Inc.

    357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 44 times
    In NLRB v. Sheridan Creations, Inc., 357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1005, 87 S.Ct. 711, 17 L.Ed.2d 544 (1967), the employer contended that its attempted withdrawal from the multi-employer bargaining unit was authorized because three of its four employees desired not to be represented by the union.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc.

    367 F.2d 55 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that where an agreement contains a “savings and severability” clause, the agreement “should not be completely obliterated because some provisions are beyond the legal limits ... unless such illegal provisions permeate the complete contract to such an extent as to affects its enforceability entirely”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Spun-Jee Corporation

    385 F.2d 379 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 25 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Spun-Jee Corporation, 385 F.2d 379 (2d Cir.), it was found that the union was clearly put on notice of the intended shutdown of the plant and its removal to a different state and that the union had thus waived its right to bargain.

  4. Western States Coun. No. 3, v. N.L.R.B

    398 F.2d 770 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 15 times

    No. 21317. Argued April 25, 1968. Decided June 19, 1968. Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. John Silard and George Kaufmann and Mrs. Harriett R. Taylor, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Charles F. Prael, San Francisco, Cal., with

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Dover Tavern Owners' Association

    412 F.2d 725 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 13 times

    No. 17546. Argued May 9, 1969. Decided June 11, 1969. Joseph Yablonski, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Milford Salny, Netcong, N.J., for respondents. Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on a petition for enforcement of the

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Southwestern Colorado Con. Ass'n

    379 F.2d 360 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 13 times
    Finding leading questions appropriate under similar statutory provision because "[b]y virtue of [former employee's] status as the proprietor of one of the respondent firms as well as his former official position within [the Defendant] Association, his interests and sympathies were clearly aligned with those of the other respondent"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Strong

    386 F.2d 929 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 11 times
    Approving trial examiner's finding that union representative's failure to tell employer that he was bound by master contract was not a waiver of the employer's purported withdrawal

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Banknote Company

    281 F.2d 893 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 18 times

    No. 16700. September 6, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Richard J. Scupi, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., J.H. Doesburg, Jr., J.N. Goddess, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before ORR and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. Before the Court is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board dated September