§

Big Three Industrial Gas & Equipment Co.

165 N.L.R.B. 1069 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Big Three Industrial Gas & Equipment Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Big Three Welding Equipment Company

    359 F.2d 77 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that NLRB could not order reinstatement of employees who committed theft

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.

    358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 26 times
    In Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Council Manufacturing Corporation

    334 F.2d 161 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 18 times

    No. 17534. July 13, 1964. Morton Namrow, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., and Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Edgar E. Bethell, of Bethell Pearce, Fort Smith, Ark., for respondent. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, BLACKMUN and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges. BLACKMUN

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  8. Martin Sprocket Gear Company v. N.L.R.B

    329 F.2d 417 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 17 times

    No. 19463. March 19, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 22, 1964. Winfred Hooper, Jr., George Q. McGown, III, R.W. Decker, McGown, Godfrey, Logan Decker, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Janet Kohn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BROWN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Tepper

    297 F.2d 280 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times
    Processing of milk by an employer who was primarily a processor and processed milk from other farms not included under exemption

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Anchor Rome Mills

    228 F.2d 775 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 11 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Anchor Rome Mills, supra, 228 F.2d 775, the Board had found a discriminatory failure to reemploy 35 former strikers.