§

Bickford Shoes, Inc.

109 N.L.R.B. 1346 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Bickford Shoes, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Markham v. Cabell

    326 U.S. 404 (1945)   Cited 346 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Markham v. Cabell, 326 U.S. 404, 409, 66 S.Ct. 193, 195, the Court said, "The policy as well as the letter of the law is a guide to decision.

  3. Cabell v. Markham

    148 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1945)   Cited 391 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Warning "not to make a fortress out of the dictionary"

  4. Labor Board v. Stowe Spinning Co.

    336 U.S. 226 (1949)   Cited 46 times
    In NLRB v. Stowe Spinning Co., 336 U.S. 226, 232-33, 69 S.Ct. 541, 544, 93 L.Ed. 638 (1949), the Court declined to enforce an order requiring an employer to make its meeting hall available to a union; the Board might legitimately bar discrimination against unions, the Court said, but could not require the employer to prefer unions over other potential users.

  5. Modern Manufacturing v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    344 U.S. 816 (1952)   Cited 27 times

    No. 54. Decided October 13, 1952. C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. James Barnes for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Finding and Mozart G. Ratner for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent. Reported below: 193 F. 2d 613.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Houston Chronicle

    211 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 54 times
    Subcontracting union work

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gottfried Baking

    210 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 24 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gottfried Baking Co., 210 F.2d 772 (2 Cir., 1954), this court considered and rejected the same argument on nearly identical facts: "We think it is unimportant whether or not the Association existed as a formal entity, so long as it is clear that [the employer] acted jointly with other employers in the Association in the negotiation of collective agreements, as the impact upon interstate commerce would be the same in either case."

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerset Classics

    193 F.2d 613 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 25 times

    No. 58, Docket 22081. Argued December 11, 1951. Decided January 14, 1952. Willis S. Ryza, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Dominick L. Manoli, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Walter J. Mahoney, of Buffalo, N.Y., and George Moskowitz, of New York City, for respondent Somerset Classics, Inc. Aaron L. Danzig

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Natl. Garment Co.

    166 F.2d 233 (8th Cir. 1948)   Cited 29 times

    No. 13570. January 7, 1948. Rehearing Denied February 5, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board against National Garment Company and another for enforcement of order requiring respondents to cease and desist from unfair labor practices and to bargain collectively. Enforcement ordered. Charles K. Hackler, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of St. Louis, Mo. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Hopwood Retinning

    104 F.2d 302 (2d Cir. 1939)   Cited 41 times
    In NLRB v. Hopwood Retinning Co., 104 F.2d 302 (2d Cir. 1939), the employer had locked out and discharged employees because of their union activity.