§

BG Electronics

13-CA-042950 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 7, 2006)
BG Electronics

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Ark Las Vegas Restaurant Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    334 F.3d 99 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 47 times
    Upholding NLRB panel's finding that employer violated the NLRA when supervisor banned employee from talking to her coworkers about joining a union

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Joy Recovery Tech

    134 F.3d 1307 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Concluding that "[i]n this case, timing is everything," where "[t]he closing of the department comes on the heels of the union's organizational activity," including filing a petition for a representation election

  6. FPC Holdings, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    64 F.3d 935 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that company's knowledge of employee's union involvement was properly inferred from the fact that the employees discussed a planned union meeting openly in the company's warehouse and over the company's CB radio at a time when the company was closely monitoring one of the employee's behavior

  7. Uniroyal Technology Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    151 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 2 times
    Noting that union activist's “glowing performance reviews” and willingness to fill in on overtime shifts factored into the analysis of whether union activity was a motivating factor in discharge

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Bestway Trucking, Inc.

    22 F.3d 177 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that "the demonstrated falsity of some of the reasons offered by [the employer] for its actions. . . support the Board's conclusion that [the employer] acted with anti-union animus" when it made the employees' working conditions intolerable

  9. Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    985 F.2d 801 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 4 times

    No. 92-4391. March 12, 1993. Frank W. Buck, David A. Posner, Duvin, Cahn Barnard, Cleveland, OH, and Martin T. Wymer, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Electronic Data Systems Corp., Dallas, TX, for petitioners. Margaret G. Bezou, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputies Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Sup. Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for respondent. Michael Dunn, Director, Region 16 N.L.R.B., Ft. Worth, TX, for other interested parties. Petitions for Review of Order of National Labor Relations Board

  10. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,349 times   89 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  11. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,327 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Granting "employees" the right to unionize