§

Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services

339 N.L.R.B. 1243 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services

4 Cited authorities

  1. Torrington Extend-A-Care Emp. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    17 F.3d 580 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that Board could rely on circumstantial evidence to establish one person's knowledge of another's union activities

  2. Beverly Health Rehab. Serv. v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.3d 316 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 18 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding no unfairness where the plaintiff “had every incentive to—and did—litigate the issue before the [previous court]”

  3. Beverly California Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    227 F.3d 817 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may not probe directly or indirectly into an employee's reasons for supporting a union

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Beverly H. R. Ser

    187 F.3d 769 (8th Cir. 1999)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 98-3391 Submitted: March 11, 1999 Filed: August 3, 1999 Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the respondent was Michael R. Flaherty of Chicago, IL. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the petitioner was Robert J. Englehart of the NLRB of Washington, D.C. Before McMILLIAN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and NANGLE, District Judge. The Honorable John F. Nangle, United States District Judge