§

Bethlehem Temple Learning Center

330 N.L.R.B. 1177 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Bethlehem Temple Learning Center

9 Cited authorities

  1. Liteky v. United States

    510 U.S. 540 (1994)   Cited 7,947 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a judge's impatience and annoyance did not justify disqualification

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Machinists v. Street

    367 U.S. 740 (1961)   Cited 468 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the individual Street plaintiffs "have in the course of [this action] made known to their respective unions their objection to the use of their money for the support of political causes . . . the respective unions were without power to use payments thereafter tendered by them for such political causes"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. U.S. v. Mitan

    966 F.2d 1165 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 18 times
    Finding no error where district court attempted to "curb" defense counsel's improper statements and behavior

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wilson

    335 F.2d 449 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 2 times

    No. 20969. July 13, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Elliot Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Robert A. Armstrong, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Leroy Jeffers and W.D. Deakins, Jr., and Vinson, Elkins, Weems Searls, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellees. Chris Dixie, Houston, Tex., amicus curiae. Dixie Schulman, Houston, Tex., for movant. Before HUTCHESON, PRETTYMAN, and JONES, Circuit

  7. Rule 609 - Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction

    Fed. R. Evid. 609   Cited 4,533 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a ten-year time limit, absent unusual circumstances, on the use of prior convictions for impeachment purposes

  8. Rule 611 - Mode and Order of Examining Witnesses and Presenting Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 611   Cited 1,937 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Granting trial judge broad discretion to control witness examination

  9. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions