§

Bethany Medical Center

328 N.L.R.B. 1094 (N.L.R.B. 1999)
Bethany Medical Center

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 751 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

  2. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 205 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 355 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  6. N.L.R.B. v. McCullough Environmental Serv

    5 F.3d 923 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 97 times
    Concluding that statement that "things were going to get a lot tougher around here" upon unionization constituted a threat

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Federal Security, Inc.

    154 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that discretionary jurisdiction may be waived

  9. East Chicago Rehabilitation Center v. N.L.R.B

    710 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 17 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Trevino v. Celanese Corp., 710 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1983), the Fifth Circuit held that in determining whether a corporation related to an employer may be liable under Title VII as a joint employer four factors are to be considered: (1) interrelation of operations; (2) centralized control of labor relations; (3) common management; and (4) common ownership or financial control.

  10. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction