§

Bethany College

14-CA-201546 (N.L.R.B. Oct. 31, 2018)
Bethany College

20 Cited authorities

  1. Lemon v. Kurtzman

    403 U.S. 602 (1971)   Cited 2,349 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding school-aid statute authorizing government inspection of parochial school records created an impermissible "intimate and continuing relationship between church and state" because it required the state "to determine which expenditures are religious and which are secular"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop

    440 U.S. 490 (1979)   Cited 459 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction

  3. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 180 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

    511 U.S. 571 (1994)   Cited 96 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Board's test is inconsistent with both the statutory language and th[e] Court's precedents"

  5. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

    487 U.S. 1205 (1988)   Cited 105 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  7. In re Grand Jury Subpoena

    274 F.3d 563 (1st Cir. 2001)   Cited 140 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "the operative language [of Rule 45] is mandatory and ... courts consistently have held that the rule requires a party resisting disclosure to produce a document index or privilege log ... A party that fails to submit a privilege log is deemed to waive the underlying privilege"

  8. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

  9. University of Great Falls v. N.L.R.B

    278 F.3d 1335 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 43 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the court need not address a university's RFRA argument because the university was entitled to an exemption under Catholic Bishop, and observing that "RFRA presents a separate inquiry from Catholic Bishop"

  10. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maryland Cup Corp.

    785 F.2d 471 (4th Cir. 1986)   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding EEOC's request was not unduly burdensome where company was required to inspect photos and interview employees in order to ascertain the race of former employees, even though compliance would cost $75,000