§
Best Yet Market

9 Cited authorities

  1. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 555 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

  2. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  3. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  4. Turrisi v. Ponderosa, Inc.

    179 A.D.2d 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)   Cited 129 times

    January 30, 1992 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Montgomery County (White, J.). Crew III, J. Third-party defendant, McClellan Street Associates (hereinafter McClellan), owns a shopping center in Schenectady County and rents space to defendant, Ponderosa, Inc. On October 3, 1987, plaintiff Maria Turrisi (hereinafter Turrisi) broke her hip as a result of a slip and fall in the parking lot of the shopping center after leaving Ponderosa. In September 1988, Turrisi and her husband commenced this negligence

  5. Cary v. Fisher

    149 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)   Cited 11 times

    April 27, 1989 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Conway, J.). Mikoll, J. In the second cause of action of her first amended complaint, plaintiff alleged that defendant, as her counsel, was guilty of legal malpractice by failing to timely record her judgment of divorce, which was dated December 8, 1980, until September 8, 1982, thereby allowing all judgments filed against her husband after July 15, 1981 to become prior liens on the marital property to her detriment. Supreme Court (Prior

  6. Latrieste Restaurant v. Vil. of Port Chester

    212 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)   Cited 4 times

    February 21, 1995 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.). Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was for a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendants and all demonstrators from entering and remaining on the property located at 140 Midland Avenue, Port Chester, New York, is granted. There is no First Amendment

  7. Steltzer v. Spesaison

    161 Misc. 2d 507 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 1994)   Cited 2 times

    June 12, 1994 Pruzan, Pruzan Pruzan, Brooklyn, for petitioner. Alanna Zuckerberg-Spesaison, respondent pro se. BRUCE J. GOULD, J. The owner of this two-family attached house sued for monthly arrears of $650 for February and March 1994 for this 3 1/2-room ground floor apartment. Alanna Zuckerberg-Spesaison, the only respondent to appear, claimed breach of the warranty of habitability for petitioner's failure to remove the snow from her walkway, failure to provide adequate heat, a leak and falling

  8. Zwerin v. Geiss

    38 Misc. 2d 306 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 1963)   Cited 5 times

    January 14, 1963 Alfred Schnall for landlords. Marjorie Geiss and Mary Tubridy, tenants in person. MAURICE WAHL, J. In the two above-captioned proceedings it was stipulated that they may be tried together and a separate determination may be entered thereon. The landlords herein, husband and wife, became the owners and residents of the property at 43 Morton Street, Borough of Manhattan, in December, 1961. The building contains four small apartments, two of which are occupied by the tenants herein

  9. Brinn v. Slawson Hobbs

    273 App. Div. 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)   Cited 2 times

    November 28, 1947. Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County, HECHT, J. Martin Lippman of counsel ( Stephen S. Bernstein with him on the brief; McLaughlin Stern, attorneys), for appellant. William Gilligan for respondent. SHIENTAG, J. The question presented on this appeal is whether the consent of a lessee for a term of years (in the case at bar the term expired three days after Special Term made its decision) is necessary for the maintenance of an action by an owner of an undivided seven-eighths