§
Best Glass Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  3. Nathanson v. Labor Board

    344 U.S. 25 (1952)   Cited 279 times
    Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"

  4. Labor Board v. Gullett Gin Co.

    340 U.S. 361 (1951)   Cited 211 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Bernard Screen Print v. Univ. Term. Stevedoring Corp.

    410 U.S. 910 (1973)   Cited 56 times
    Pointing out that federal courts do not intervene in state election contests for the purpose of deciding issues of state law, if no federal constitutional question is involved

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Madison Courier, Inc.

    472 F.2d 1307 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that "[i]f the discriminatee accepts significantly lower-paying work too soon after the discrimination in question, he may be subject to a reduction in back pay on the ground that he willfully incurred a loss by accepting an `unsuitably' low paying position"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Searle Auto Glass, Inc.

    762 F.2d 769 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that because there is no statutory time limit on the filing of applications for enforcement of Board orders under Section 10(e), laches applies

  9. N.L.R.B. v. S.E. Nichols of Ohio, Inc.

    704 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times

    No. 81-1756. Argued February 22, 1983. Decided April 15, 1983. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel (argued), Frances O'Connell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leonard W. Wagman (argued), Robert S. Goodman, Golenbock Barell, New York City, for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KEITH, MARTIN, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of orders entered against S.E. Nichols of Ohio, Inc. on September

  10. Dayton Tire Rubber Co. v. N.L.R.B

    591 F.2d 566 (10th Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    Finding of unfair labor practice and discriminatory discharge is presumptive proof that some back pay is owed