§

Bernz-O-Matic Corp.

150 N.L.R.B. 72 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Bernz-O-Matic Corp.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  2. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Tenn. Coach Co.

    191 F.2d 546 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 11238. July 9, 1951. Sidney Sherman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, and Irving M. Herman, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn. (Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., on the brief; Anderson Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel), for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement

  4. Sax v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    171 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1948)   Cited 33 times
    In Sax v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 171 F.2d 769 (1948), and N.L.R.B. v. Armour Co., 5 Cir., 213 F.2d 625 (1954), the "perfunctory, innocuous remarks" stood "alone".

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McCatron

    216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McCatron, 216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. den., 1955, 348 U.S. 943, 75 S.Ct. 365, 99 L.Ed. 738, strikers acted in the good faith but mistaken belief that a fellow employee, whose reinstatement they sought, had been discharged because of union activities.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Blue Bell

    219 F.2d 796 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 24 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Blue Bell Inc., 219 F.2d 796 (4) (5 Cir. 1955) a female employee wrote a letter to employer's vice-president calling him a "liar".

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Peerless Products, Inc.

    264 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 9 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Peerless Products, Inc., 264 F.2d 769, at p. 772, C.A.7, the court said: "Upon consideration of the record as a whole we have concluded that the interrogation of the employees was not intended to and did not interfere with their organizational activities, that there were no coercive threats made to them, and that the calling in of the small personal loans for repayment did not constitute a withdrawal of economic benefits by the Company in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act.